- Sponsor
- Enrolment
- Results
- Primary endpoint
Clinical evidence answered from real trials
Ask a clinical question. Every sentence of the answer is cited to an NCT number or PMID. If there is no evidence, we say so.
ClinicalEvidence demo
Your evidence answer
Each sentence is linked to the study it comes from. Open a citation to see the source record.
ClinicalTrials.gov returned no registered trial for these words. Try other terms, or create your account to search trials and publications together.
These are the registered trials from ClinicalTrials.gov that match your question. Create your account for the cited answer written from them.
No verified answer could be formed from these records. The studies below matched your question, so you can open them directly.
Studies found
Create your account to see all studies and the full answer.
The trial table, intervention comparison and export are part of every plan.
For professional use. Answers summarize published and registered research and are not medical advice. Open every cited source before you rely on it.
The sources behind every answer
Answers come from public trial registries and the biomedical literature, refreshed every day.
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- PubMed
- PubMed Central
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- WHO ICTRP
Clinical trial evidence by therapeutic area
Start from the area you work in. Each number is the count of registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov, fetched live from the registry.
- registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov
- registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov
Evidence you can cite, not answers you have to doubt
-
Every sentence opens its source
Each sentence links to the trial record or paper behind it. Open the source in one click and quote it with confidence in a slide deck, a dossier or a reply to a colleague.
-
No source means no answer
Each citation is checked against our index before you see it. If a sentence cannot be traced to a real study, it is removed. If nothing survives, you get the matching studies and a plain statement that no verified answer exists.
-
The whole trial landscape in one table
Next to the answer you get every matching trial with phase, population, endpoints, sponsor, status and enrolment, ready to sort, filter and export.
How the cited answer is built
Three steps, a few seconds and an audit trail you can show anyone. Read the full explanation of how ClinicalEvidence works.
-
1. Ask
Type your question in plain English, the way you would ask a colleague. Narrow it by source, phase or completed studies with results when you need to.
-
2. We search and verify
ClinicalEvidence runs semantic and full text search across registered trials and published studies. It writes the answer only from the retrieved passages and verifies every citation.
-
3. You open every source
Each sentence carries its NCT number or PMID. Click it to read the registry record or the abstract and decide for yourself.
Find evidence
One workspace for evidence questions
The answer is the start. The same question opens a trial table, a comparison of interventions, alerts on new studies and exports for your reference manager.
Trial table
Phase, population, interventions, primary and secondary endpoints, results posted, sponsor, status, enrolment, dates and locations for every matching study, sortable and filterable.
Compare interventions
Put two to four interventions side by side. See which trials tested them, in whom, against what, and what each trial reported.
Alerts
Save a question and get an email when a new trial is registered or a new study is published that matches it.
Export
Download answers and tables as CSV, XLSX or DOCX with a full reference list, or send citations to your reference manager as RIS or BibTeX.
SGLT2 inhibitorsHFpEFPhase 3, 4Results posted
| Study | Phase | Enrolment | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCT03057977 EMPEROR-Preserved Empagliflozin vs placebo | 3 | 5,988 | Completed |
| NCT03619213 DELIVER Dapagliflozin vs placebo | 3 | 6,263 | Completed |
| NCT03030235 PRESERVED-HF Dapagliflozin vs placebo | 4 | 324 | Completed |
| NCT04788511 STEP-HFpEF Semaglutide vs placebo | 3 | 529 | Completed |
Compare interventions
| Empagliflozin | Dapagliflozin | |
|---|---|---|
| Trial | NCT03057977 | NCT03619213 |
| Enrolment | 5,988 | 6,263 |
| Hazard ratio | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| Paper | PMID 34449189 | PMID 36027570 |
Alerts
SGLT2 in HFpEF
Phase 3, weekly emailActive
CAR-T, myeloma
Daily emailActive
New match
NCT04923893CARTITUDE-5
Export
CSV
Trial table, 4 studies
XLSX
Table and answer sheets
DOCX
Answer with reference list
RIS
Reference manager
BibTeX
LaTeX
Lincoff AM et al. NEJM 2023;389:2221 PMID 37952131
How ClinicalEvidence compares with the usual tools
Registry and PubMed features depend on the source. General AI chat features depend on the tool and enabled integrations.
Searches trials and publications together
- ClinicalEvidence
- Yes
- Manual registry search
- No, trials only
- PubMed alone
- No, publications only
- General AI chat
- Partial, tool dependent
Every sentence cited to an NCT number or PMID
- ClinicalEvidence
- Yes
- Manual registry search
- N/A, copy sources yourself
- PubMed alone
- N/A, copy sources yourself
- General AI chat
- No guarantee
Says when there is no evidence instead of guessing
- ClinicalEvidence
- Yes
- Manual registry search
- N/A, review results yourself
- PubMed alone
- N/A, review results yourself
- General AI chat
- No guarantee
Trial table with phase, status, sponsor and enrolment
- ClinicalEvidence
- Yes
- Manual registry search
- Partial, registry view
- PubMed alone
- No
- General AI chat
- Partial, source dependent
Alerts on new trials
- ClinicalEvidence
- Yes
- Manual registry search
- Yes, saved searches
- PubMed alone
- No, publication alerts only
- General AI chat
- Partial, tool dependent
Export of tables and citations
- ClinicalEvidence
- Yes
- Manual registry search
- Partial, trial records
- PubMed alone
- Partial, citations
- General AI chat
- Partial, unverified
Comparing specific products? Read our side by side comparisons with OpenEvidence, Elicit, Consensus and Scite.
Estimate the time your team spends
Use your team's total questions per week. Team size provides context and does not multiply the estimate.
Use your own estimate of the time spent searching registries and abstracts.
Hours your team spends on manual evidence searching per month
Based on your inputs and an average of 4.33 weeks per month. This is your estimate of manual search time, not a measured saving.
ClinicalEvidence replaces the registry and abstract search step with one cited answer. Compare your estimate with the price of the Research Team plan.
For medical affairs, clinical development and CRO leads
Your team answers evidence questions every day. ClinicalEvidence searches the registries and the literature in one step and shows the record behind every sentence. Every answer comes with the sources a reviewer will ask for.
- One question searches registries and publications at once, with each sentence linked to its source
- An audit trail of sources behind every sentence
- Shared workspaces, saved threads and comments
- Roles, single sign-on and an audit log on Enterprise
- Monthly or yearly invoicing for your finance team
See how teams use it in pharma, medtech, CROs and medical affairs.
See team plans
Medical affairs workspaceAudit log on
Saved threads
- GLP-1 MACE, no diabetes
- SGLT2 in HFpEF
- CAR-T, myeloma
MACE down 20% versus placebo, no diabetes NCT03574597 PMID 37952131
Comment, reviewer
Add to field deck, slide 4
Exported DOCX3 seatsRole, editor
Audit log
| 09:14 | Asked a question about published trials | Editor |
| 09:15 | Opened NCT03574597 | Editor |
| 09:16 | Thread saved in the workspace | Editor |
| 09:21 | Role changed to viewer | Admin |
| 09:40 | Exported DOCX | Reviewer |
Encrypted in transit and at rest
Security and data protection built for regulated teams
You ask questions about published research, so ClinicalEvidence never needs patient data.
- No patient data required, ever
- Your questions and threads stay in your workspace
- Roles and permissions for every team member
- Audit log of who asked what and when
- Encrypted in transit and at rest
Read more about security and data protection.
Clinical evidence software pricing for clinicians and teams
Save 50% with yearly billing. Every plan includes cited answers, citation verification and the trial table.
Clinician
For an individual clinician or researcher.
24
USD / month
Billed yearly
- 200 cited answers per month, 25 per day
- Trial table with up to 50 studies per answer
- Intervention comparisons
- 5 alerts
- Export to CSV, RIS and BibTeX
Most popular
Research Team
For a small research or medical affairs team.
99
USD / month
Billed yearly
- 800 cited answers per month, pooled for 3 seats
- Trial table with up to 200 studies per answer
- 25 alerts
- Export to CSV, XLSX, DOCX, RIS and BibTeX
- Shared workspaces, comments and roles
Organization
For a department, CRO practice or consultancy.
249
USD / month
Billed yearly
- 2 000 cited answers per month, pooled for 10 seats
- Trial table with up to 500 studies per answer
- 100 alerts
- Bulk CSV export
- Audit log and invoicing
Enterprise
For pharma, medtech and hospital systems.
745
USD / month
Billed yearly
- 6 000 cited answers per month, pooled for up to 50 seats
- Trial table with up to 1 000 studies per answer
- 500 alerts
- Single sign-on (SAML) and audit log
- Priority support, named contact and invoicing
Clinician
- Yearly, per month
- 24 USD
- Monthly
- 49 USD
- Cited answers per month
- 200
- Seats
- 1
Research Team
- Yearly, per month
- 99 USD
- Monthly
- 199 USD
- Cited answers per month
- 800 pooled
- Seats
- 3
Organization
- Yearly, per month
- 249 USD
- Monthly
- 499 USD
- Cited answers per month
- 2 000 pooled
- Seats
- 10
Enterprise
- Yearly, per month
- 745 USD
- Monthly
- 1 490 USD
- Cited answers per month
- 6 000 pooled
- Seats
- up to 50
Prices in USD. Yearly plans are billed once a year. See the full clinical evidence software pricing.
Questions professionals ask before they trust an AI with evidence
Does ClinicalEvidence make up studies or citations?
No. Answers are written only from passages retrieved from our index of registered trials and published studies. Every citation is checked against the index before you see it, and an answer without verified sources is not shown.
What happens if there is no evidence for my question?
You get a plain statement that the index holds no trial or publication that answers it, plus the closest matching studies if there are any. ClinicalEvidence never fills the gap from model memory.
Which sources does it search?
ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, the open access subset of PubMed Central, the EU Clinical Trials Register and the WHO ICTRP where the licence allows. Each answer lists only the sources that were actually searched for that question.
How fresh is the data?
The index is refreshed every day, so newly registered trials, updated statuses and new publications reach your answers within a day.
Is this medical advice?
No. ClinicalEvidence is a research tool for healthcare and life science professionals. It summarizes what studies report and links every claim to its source so you can verify it. It is not intended for patients. Read the medical disclaimer.
Can my team share answers?
Yes. Research Team, Organization and Enterprise include shared workspaces where colleagues save threads, comment on answers and reuse them.
Can I export to my reference manager?
Yes. Every plan exports citations as RIS and BibTeX, and Research Team and higher add XLSX and DOCX with a full reference list.
How is the yearly discount billed?
Yearly plans cost half the monthly price and are billed once for twelve months. You can switch from monthly to yearly at any time.
Can I get a refund?
Payments are final, as described in our refund policy. The one-time demo lets you see a real cited answer before you subscribe, and you can cancel renewal at any time.
More answers in the FAQ.
Ask your next clinical question with sources attached
Try the one-time demo now. Your answer arrives with every study linked.