AI for medical research that cites every sentence
Scope a research question, write the background of a grant application and find where the evidence runs out, with answers built only from registered trials and published studies.
Research work before the real work begins
Before a systematic review, a trial protocol or a grant application, a researcher has to know what is already there. How many trials address the question, which populations and outcomes they cover, what has been published and what is registered but never reported. Getting that overview by hand takes days of searching PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP portal, often for a question that changes shape along the way.
General chatbots look like a shortcut, but they can invent studies and references, and a fabricated citation in a grant background is a serious problem. Researchers need speed without giving up traceability.
- Scoping a topic across both literature and trial registries
- Background sections that reviewers can verify reference by reference
- Spotting completed trials with no posted results or publication
- Finding populations, comparators and outcomes nobody has studied
A typical scoping workflow in ClinicalEvidence
-
1. Ask a broad question, for example what trials and studies have tested exercise interventions for cancer related fatigue in older adults.
-
2. Read the cited answer. Every sentence carries NCT numbers or PMIDs, and each citation is verified against the index before you see it.
-
3. Narrow the question with filters for study type, phase, date range, country and results available.
-
4. Open the trial table and look for completed studies without results, or for outcomes that appear in only a few trials.
-
5. Ask follow-up questions in the same saved thread to test where the evidence is thin.
-
6. Export references to RIS or BibTeX for your reference manager and keep the thread for the methods section of your review.
-
When the index has no evidence, the answer says so. A plain "no evidence found" is often the most useful result in scoping, because it points to a gap. Read about the PICOS framework for structuring questions, and about using ClinicalEvidence as systematic review software support.
Features that matter for researchers
- Cited answers with verified NCT and PMID links
- PubMed AI search combined with trial registries in one index
- A trial table with phase, population, interventions, endpoints, status, enrolment and results posted
- Evidence summaries with the level of evidence per source
- Export to CSV, RIS and BibTeX on every plan, plus XLSX and DOCX on Research Team
- Shared workspaces for a research group on Research Team
ClinicalEvidence supports scoping and background work. It does not replace a registered systematic review protocol, duplicate screening or formal risk of bias assessment.
Recommended plan for researchers
An individual researcher starts with Clinician at 49 USD per month, or 24 USD per month billed yearly (288 USD): 200 cited answers per month, up to 25 per day, 1 seat, trial tables of up to 50 studies, 5 alerts and export to CSV, RIS and BibTeX.
A research group chooses Research Team at 199 USD per month, or 99 USD per month billed yearly (1 188 USD), with 800 cited answers pooled across 3 seats, trial tables of up to 200 studies, 25 alerts, DOCX and XLSX export and shared workspaces. See every limit on the pricing page.
Questions from researchers
Can I use ClinicalEvidence for a systematic review?
Use it for scoping, background and checking the trial landscape. A systematic review still needs a registered protocol, reproducible database searches and duplicate screening, which you run with your usual tools.
Will it invent references?
No. Answers are built only from passages retrieved from the index, every citation is checked to exist and to support the sentence, and an answer without verified sources is not shown.
Can I export references to my reference manager?
Yes. Every plan exports to RIS and BibTeX. Research Team and higher plans also export to DOCX with a reference list.
Scope your next research question with sources you can verify
Create your account and ask your first research question today.